During the 1960s, group sharing became a common practice at conferences and “workshops”. The idea was taken up with gusto. Under the guidance of a “facilitator”, the discussion was carried out in such a way that everyone was able to contribute. Someone was chosen to “report back”, preferably with the “findings” of the group written up with multi-coloured Koki chalks on large sheets of blank newsprint specially provided for the purpose. The method generated course…after course…after course. And in the end, they all started to look exactly the same, whether the topic was the Holy Trinity or Icelandic cookery.
Why was this? It was because the method began to become more important than the actual discussion itself. When one came back one was frequently handed an “evaluation sheet”. The questions on this “evaluation sheet” never asked what new insights or creative thoughts were produced by the group. This was presumed. In fact, the content of the discussion never seemed to matter much at all. What was important was whether everyone had had ample opportunity to express themselves, whether or not the “facilitator” had been encouraging of the quieter members, whether the discussion had been “non-judgemental” or “non-threatening”; and so on. What was important was that the method itself had been applied. Whether or not the method had engendered any meaningful discussion or conclusions seemed to be a non-question. It was all about the method, rarely about the content.
.jpg)
Jesus often has a similar problem with his co-religionists. For the Jewish people, with their lofty and unapproachable understanding of God, the Law was their only means of drawing near to him. Loving and obeying the Law was the bridge that drew one close to God. But the Law became so important that it started to replace God in the religion of Israel. What was important was not whether the Law drew one closer to God so much as whether the Law in itself was applied. In fact, just as people who used the group-discussion method all too often showed signs of feeling superior simply because they were using the method, so did many of the Pharisees feel morally superior simply because they obeyed the Law.
Christians can also be guilty of this. We are privileged to live in a relationship with the Lord Jesus, risen from the dead. It is in this personal, living relationship with Jesus that our salvation lies. But how often do we try to feel superior by counting up the obligations we have fulfilled. By attending superior liturgies. By doing things rather than loving God and one another. What is important is not what we do for God, but how much we love him and offer our lives to him. He himself gave up everything for us.
It is God whom we love and serve, God as he has revealed himself to us in and through the living Lord Jesus. We need to give ourselves to him completely, to offer up our lives to him in service. But mostly, to let all things be paths to him, not ends in themselves. To him be glory for ever and ever. Amen.
Fr Phillip
